(Pic: Foma)

A Cold War classic lives on in the 21st Century

Fomapan 100 is a black and white film made by Foma in the Czech Republic, and available in a variety of formats.

Most of us are familiar with the giants of film – Kodak, Agfa, Ilford and Fujifilm – but there were many other companies who made film as well. One of the smaller producers who proved popular to photographers on a budget was Foma, which started producing film in 1921 in what was then Czechoslovakia.

Fomapan 100 was Foma’s cheap-as-chips 100 ASA panchromatic black and white film, competing in the Eastern Bloc with films made by the likes of Orwo (East Germany) and Svema (USSR). Foma films were also available in Western Europe – many photographers on a budget shot on Foma until they could afford pricier films from the likes of Kodak and Ilford. Panchromatic means its sensitive to all wavelengths of light in the spectrum.

Greenwich pub on a Praktica MTL 50

Foma closed down amid the tumult of the Velvet Spring and the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, and returned in 1995, two years after Czechoslovakia split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Ever since, Foma has been expanding into new markets, with their products usually significantly cheaper than the big-name brands, from its factory in Hradec Kralove in the Czech Republic. It’s available in 35mm (24 and 26 and 30.5 metre bulk rolls), 120 and various sheet film formats, including 5×8 and 8×10.

Fomapan 100 is a contrast black and white film with hard blacks and fine grain. It’s an excellent film to use in natural light, giving biting contrast without washing out highlights. Inhard light it can be comparable to Fuji’s Acros 100 film or the old Agfa APX 100 film, both excellent films in their own right, but grainier; it’s not heavy grain, but it does help to give Fomapan 100 an idiosyncratic, atmospheric feel.  

Istanbul tram, on a Zenit 16 and Zenitar-M 50/1.7

It’s  now widely available in Europe, often costing less than 4€ a roll in 35mm. In the US, it’s repackaged as Arista EDU100, popular with photography students and those shooting on a more restricted budget – it sells for just $3.59 through distributor Freestyle.

It really comes into its own as a travel film; its rich blacks and restrained grain good for capturing detail and form in bright sunlight. Many of those who shoot with it like the fact that it looks different to the more clinically sharp Kodak and Ilford films, evoking black-and-white films from the 1960s and 70s.

Some photographers vouch on pairing this film when using older cameras, or lenses that lack modern coatings – Fomapan 100’s ‘classic’ characteristics make it a good match.

This film used to have a tendency to curl, which could make it more challenging to scan – this was usually an issue with rolls that were marked “Professional” rather than “Classic”.

For a while, Fomapan 100 also had a reputation for scratching a lot easier than other black-and-white films thanks both to the curling and to how soft the coatings were while the film was still wet; this was a problem most likely to be found in 120-format rolls .

Istanbul commuter, Pentax ES II and SMC Takumar 55/1.8

Certainly, the most recent batches of Fomapan 100 don’t suffer from those issues; it also dries very flat which makes it excellent for scanning.

 I’ve been shooting Fomapan 100 for several years, mostly as a sunny weather travel film. Only once or twice have I encountered  serious scratching, and this was several years ago. What I can vouch for is the film’s atmospheric grain and superb tonal range.

I’ve tried matching it with older SLRs – such as the KMZ Start, Kiev-10 and Praktica IV – and rangefinders like my Zorkis and old compacts (as you can see below). I’m particularly impressed with shots I got using Fomapan 100 in overcast conditions in a Istanbul back in 2015, loaded into an old Soviet FED 50 compact.

Overcast Istanbul ferry crossing on a FED 50

I usually scan Fomapan 100 myself, but have been impressed with lab scans from labs that know the film well. I visit Istanbul often, and one lab there – Foto Halis in Hatih, on the Sultanahmet side of the Golden Horn, seems to be the distributor for Foma products. Their scans are beautifully rich, with deep contrast.

If you’re developing it yourself, the consensus seems to be Rodinal, though other developers such as X-tol or Diafine will also yield good results.

Nice beach, on a Zorki 4K and LOMOgraphy Jupiter-3 50/1.5
Blackheath flare, on a Porst 135 C Auto (Cosina CX-1)
Lab-scanned Istanbul candid,from Foto Halis – note the rich tones (Zenit E, Helios-44 58/2)
Greenwich Park, Praktica IV F and CZJ Tessar 50/2.8

Subscribe

* indicates required

Stephen Dowling
Follow me

5
5
votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ante
7 years ago

Thank you for this article. It really is a great film and I was pleasantly surprised with its quality, especially for such a low price. Fomafoto sell them for only 3 Euros/roll! Heard a rumor that LOMOgraphy 100 Earl Grey is basically a repackaged Fomapan 100, but I can’t seem to find confirmation anywhere. Also, while Fomapan 200 gave nice results (I got really dramatic-looking photos with that one), I wasn’t as thrilled with Fomapan 400, which doesn’t like pushing very much – there’s a noticeable loss of detail, but not surprised if it’s really an ISO250 film like people… Read more »

Bob Dungan
Bob Dungan
7 years ago

Arista.EDU 100 is my primary 120 film. After trying several developers I now use Caffenol CM(rs) 68 degrees Two or three minute pre-rinse. I use plastic tank and rod to agitate for 30 seconds and then 5-6 seconds every 30 seconds till done for a total of 12.5 minutes. Dump and fill tank with water agitate for 30 seconds, repeat twice for a total of three times. Fix per manufacturers instructions. I use Perma Wash to wash film and final rinse with generic version of Photo Flo. Works well in my old 120/620 cameras. Link to my Flickr album with… Read more »

Tim
Tim
7 years ago

It’s one of my favorites. I process with Rodinal (1+25) @20 degrees and get very good results. I buy it in bulk and “roll my own”. I’m quite happy with it.

Christos Theofilogiannakos
Christos Theofilogiannakos
7 years ago

Yep, Fomapan and Rodinal pair very well together. I’ve also found that Fomapan 100 does very well when exposed through one of the old Color-Skopars on the Voigtlander Vitos. After Tri-X, the Fomapan 400 (usually pulled a bit if lighting conditions permit) is my favorite “fast” B&W film, much more versatile than HP5+, esp. when stand-developed.

Joe shoots resurrected cameras

I’m developing a taste for older, contrastier films and really likes what this gives me. And of course back when lenses didn’t have as much contrast as today, the film really did have to be punchy! Shooting Foma or Double-X with old lenses really is like traveling back in time!

Lorenzo Mascherpa
3 years ago

By the end of 2019 I dusted off all my film cameras, three Nikons with different optics, the Mamiya RB 67, the Toyo view 4×5 all with different optics to which I add a wonderful Leica III with Summitar 50mm f 2 and the Zeiss super Ikonta 531 bought by my father in the 1950s. You understand that I needed a lot of film to test the devices. after a tour of the online shops I chose the form of low prices and “old Style” film I started with ilford ID11, then Ro9 Fomadon, excel fomadon and again LQR fomadon… Read more »

e803
e803
4 months ago

How do you cope with a Foma film light meter showing at 2.8? Focusing on the eyes of your portrait picture? Does it make any diffference if I focus on eternity?