Olympus XA review

20
1447
3655546995_0afa2ca4e7_b
Olympus XA, with its equally compact flash (Pic: Dave Fayram)

Cameras don’t come much smaller than the Olympus XA. A compact camera with a clamshell sliding door, this little rangefinder was sold on the strengths of its pocketable size. But its strengths didn’t end there.

Designed by Olympus’s legendary Yoshihisa Maitani and released in 1979, the XA packed a lot of punch for a camera small enough to stuff in your pocket. No Lomo-style zone-focusing here – the XA was a rangefinder like it’s bigger, bulkier cousins such as the Leica and the Contax, but a fraction of the size. The Zuiko lens contained in the XA’s tiny frame was sharp and contrasty (Olympus had an enviable reputation for its lenses thanks to the OM range of SLRs and the Olympus Trip compact).

The XA quickly became a favourite with street photographers – the camera’s tiny size makes it look like a tourist’s happy snapper, rather than something a serious photographer would use; perfect for grabbing shots without anyone noticing.

Why’s the XA so good? It focuses down to less than a metre, the lens opens up to 2.8 – it even has an over-ride so you can take pics with strong backlighting. The shutter button responds to the lightest touch, meaning camera shake in this little gems is kept to a minimum. The XA was only the start of a series of XAs, including the Lomo-like zone-focusing XA2, a selenium-celled version called the XA1 and the macro XA4.

The excellent camera review site Photoethnography described the XA as ” the camera that professional photographers carry on their vacations”. I first realised how good the XA was when Phil Coomes, the BBC News website’s picture editor, used one for his 64×64 project to mark the dying days of Kodachrome 64. Soon after I found one for sale at the RPS’s annual photography fair in London – in perfect working order for£4. You can find them for cheaper on eBay, but being able to prod and poke old film cameras and see if they’re actually working is always a good idea.

I wasn’t disappointed. The XA is an incredibly good camera, packed with features that would usually be found on much more expensive – and much bigger cameras. My XA has travelled with me to Barcelona and Dubrovnik, and a sunny Reading festival. It’s not only a superb street shooter but perfect for Lomo-style shooting – cross-processed slide comes out a treat. With an ISO setting that goes up to 800, there’s plenty of scope for low-light shooting, especially as there’s no mirror to cause camera shake.

I hadn’t shot on the Olympus for 18 months or so, but pulled it out of the camera drawer to take on a recent trip to Brighton. In bright but overcast weather, the XA paired with Fomapan 200 was perfect; punchy pics with hard, contrasty blacks.

The old school photographer’s advice is always have a camera with you. The XA should be that camera.

See pics below, or on my Flickr here.

5529034135_16b5870194_b
Xpro ferris wheel at Reading Festival
5625484014_1d2cf3accf_b
Xpro BT Tower – retro blue, 70s style
7121033085_efb2bb852f_b
Snapped at the National Theatre on a sunny spring day
5625484396_3ba4765264_o
Queen’s Park Xpro foliage
6974951394_e5d856be70_o
Somerset House art installation

20
Leave a Reply

avatar
16 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
RobertMarcel SchepersIs that an XA in your pocket? | Slow photographyXpro Tips and Tricks - Japan Camera Hunterjimmyca1219 Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
urbanhafner
Guest

Great shots! The XA is on my list of cameras to acquire. I already have its later cousin the mju-II, but sometimes all this autofocus, autowind stuff does get in the way.

titaniummike
Guest

Reblogged this on TITANIUM MIKE.

symbolicinteraction
Guest

Design of this camera is truly lovely – it’s small, fast and just fun to use. But i sold mine, because I was disenchanted by the quality of image it provided. It wasn’t very sharp even at f=4-5.6 (I did some 18cmx24cm prints and not impressive sharpness was already visible). Maybe mine XA was faulty, but if it’s normal, then I prefer any other 70s rangefinder camera – a little bigger and harder to hide in your pocket, but sharp and contrasty as hell.

Christos Theofilogiannakos
Guest

Yes, a Hi-Matic 7s will give you better pics, but you can’t hide it!

symbolicinteraction
Guest

Maybe it’s harder to fit into a pocket, but I didn’t say it’s impossible.

symbolicinteraction
Guest

Design of this camera is truly lovely – it’s small, fast and just fun to use. But i sold mine, because I was disenchanted by the quality of image it provided. It wasn’t very sharp even at f=4-5.6 (I did some 18cmx24cm prints and not impressive sharpness was already visible). Maybe mine XA was faulty, but if it’s normal, then I prefer any other 70s rangefinder camera – a little bigger and harder to hide in your pocket, but sharp and contrasty as hell.

Christos Theofilogiannakos
Guest

Yes, a Hi-Matic 7s will give you better pics, but you can’t hide it!

symbolicinteraction
Guest

Maybe it’s harder to fit into a pocket, but I didn’t say it’s impossible.

Moose Borrowdale
Guest

I bought one of these when they first came out and was delighted with it. I used it for a number of years and it was a little marvel for it’s time. I still have it and since reading this article have decided to take it for a spin later this week, for old times sake. I know it isn’t the sharpest of lenses but used for the right purpose i.e. where composition and mood is more important than tack sharpness, it can produce great results. I was always pleased with the quality of the images I made back in… Read more »

Moose Borrowdale
Guest

I bought one of these when they first came out and was delighted with it. I used it for a number of years and it was a little marvel for it’s time. I still have it and since reading this article have decided to take it for a spin later this week, for old times sake. I know it isn’t the sharpest of lenses but used for the right purpose i.e. where composition and mood is more important than tack sharpness, it can produce great results. I was always pleased with the quality of the images I made back in… Read more »

jimmyca1219
Guest

I’m going to get one!

jimmyca1219
Guest

I’m going to get one!

trackback

[…] as do the Diana and Holga range of toy cameras. My favourites so far, aside from my Lomos, are the Olympus XA and the Zenit 3M. The Olympus XA is not exactly a lo-fi camera – it’s a masterpiece of […]

trackback

[…] as do the Diana and Holga range of toy cameras. My favourites so far, aside from my Lomos, are the Olympus XA and the Zenit 3M. The Olympus XA is not exactly a lo-fi camera – it’s a masterpiece of […]

trackback

[…] Advance and Zorki Photo have nice detailed reviews, so check them out if you want to learn more. There is a also a site […]

trackback

[…] Advance and Zorki Photo have nice detailed reviews, so check them out if you want to learn more. There is a also a site […]

Marcel Schepers
Guest

Excellent camera! Too bad the range finder patch fades with time ….

Marcel Schepers
Guest

Excellent camera! Too bad the range finder patch fades with time ….

Robert
Guest

Olympus xa is a very nice small camera. When i was traveling during summer i used xa withuot flash so it was even smaller. I have xa for a long time but i dont use it very much.

Robert
Guest

Olympus xa is a very nice small camera. When i was traveling during summer i used xa withuot flash so it was even smaller. I have xa for a long time but i dont use it very much.